Salinity effect on water absorption, germination, growth and its relationship with varietal tolerance (página 2)
Enviado por L. Argentel
A totally randomized experimental arrangement was used with three repetitions for each experimental variant. The duration of the first rehearsal was 24 hours. The variables evaluated were the content of absorbed water (AW) by means of the gravimeter method and it was expressed in fresh base (6):
AW= (FW-IW)/FW
Where PI and PF, represent the initial and final weight of the seeds, respectively.
This experiment was repeated twice in the time and due to the similarity of the data they were analyzed in a combined way.
A similar experiment was mounted but using filter paper in the badges to evaluate, 7 days after the germination, the growth variables: plants height (HP), root length (RL) and fresh (FM) and dry matters (DM) accumulation, all data were expressed in relative values to the control.
In the third experiment 12 varieties of wheat of the species Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum were selected, coming from Cuba and Mexico, which are described in the following chart.
Studied wheat varieties . Species and origin.
No | Verieties. | symbol | Origin | Specie |
1 | CubaC- 204 | CC-204 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
2 | 10 TH 29 | 10 TH 29 | Mexico | T. aestivum |
3 | Mexicana24 | Mex24 | Mexico | T. aestivum |
4 | Idyn 18 | Idyn 18 | Mexico | T. durum |
5 | Eduyt 16 | Eduyt 16 | Mexico | T. durum |
6 | INIFAT RM -26 | IRM-26 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
7 | INIFAT RM -29 | IRM- 29 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
8 | INIFAT RM – 30 | IRM – 30 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
9 | INIFAT RM – 31 | IRM -31 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
10 | INIFAT RM -32 | IRM – 32 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
11 | INIFAT RM -36 | IRM – 36 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
12 | INIFAT RM – 37 | IRM – 37 | Cuba | T. aestivum |
A simple of 100 seeds was taken, distributed at reason of 25 by badge, placed on 10 ml of a saline solution of sodium chloride (NaCl), adjusted to an electric conductivity (CE) of 16 and 25 dS.m-1, as a control was used distilled water to an electric conductivity (CE) of 0.02 dS.m-1. The badges were distributed in a totally randomized experimental arrangement and for each variant 4 repetitions were carried out.
24 hours after the beginning of the experiment, the content of water absorbed was determined by the gravimeter method expressed in fresh base and 7 days after the germination, the growth variables: plants height (PH), root length (RL) and fresh (FM) and dry (DM) matters accumulation, were evaluated. Starting from these data the relative tolerance (RTI) to salinity was calculated, following formula:
RTI (%)= 100 (TSI/TCI),
where TSI and TCI, are the indicators evaluated in the saline and control solutions, respectively.
After checking that the obtained data fulfilled the theoretical suppositions of normality and variance homogeneity, an analysis of variance of simple classification was carried out and the differences among the treatments were detected and compared by Duncan"s multiple test of comparison for p <0.01.
An analysis of linear regression among the values of growth expressed in relative values to the control and the salinity levels was also carried out. Starting from these equations the theorical values of electric conductivity (CE) that diminish the growth and the biomass accumulation in 50% were determined.
With the purpose of establishing the most appropriate indicators for the differentiation of the varieties an analysis of principal components was carried out. After that a cluster analysis of complete binding based on a euclidian distance matrix , was carried out, whit the objective of clustering the variables according to its behavior, using for these analyses the professional statistical package STATISTICA, version 6.0 for Windows´2000.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Although the content of absorbed water by the seeds diminished as well as the saline concentration increased, the differences were only significant for the levels of 25 and 28 dS.m-1 ( Figure 1), this result confirms what have been outlined by different authors about the tolerance of this process to salinity and that it is only inhibited at high salt concentrations (10). It has been pointed out that during this stage take place mainly physique – chemical processes in the seed, such as the epiblast imbibition that is resistant to salinity (7).
About the influence of salinity in the absorption of water by the seeds of different crops several researchers have worked (11; 9) and they have arrived to similar conclusions. These authors point out, that such affectations are attributed to the high osmotic potential that is created around the seeds, causing a lengthening in the beginning of the germination, slowing the speed and the final percentage of the process.
|
Figure 1. Seeds water absorption at different saline concentrations.
However, in this experiment, certain delay was observed during germination, but the final percentage didn't show significant affectations which could be motivated due to wheat seeds have a very soft and permeable seminal cover that facilitates the entrance of water and oxygen, as well as the root emerging (12), moreover wheat seeds are also characterized by having none or residual endosperm and mature embryos that facilitates the germination (13). Similar results with wheat mutants BHP-15 AND BHP-31 (14) and with WL – 711 variety, (15) working with saline concentrations from 4 up to 16 dS.m-1 were observed.
In relation to plants growth (Figure 2) a significant increment in the inhibition of height (HP) and root length (RL) was observed as the concentrations of salts increased, affectations were found in relation to the control of 33 and 35% respectively for levels of 25 and 28 dS.m-1. In some other experiments, when evaluating plants height of the in different cultivars of hard wheat (T. durum) affectations from 30% to 23 dS.m-1 were found (16)similar to this variety for 22dS.m-1.
Figure 2. Wheat plants growth inhibition under saline conditions.
On the other hand (15) in the variety WL – 711 a reduction of 50% of plants height (AP) was found after 7 days of germination and affectations of 20% in the root length (LR) in a solution of 28 dS.m-1 were also found. The affectations observed in plants growth at the early stages of the development could be explained by a reduction of water absorption by the endosperm, in the embryonic axles and a decrease of carbohydrates translocation toward these axles or because of the inhibition of cellular division processes, lengthening and cellular differentiation associated to the lack of water or to the toxic effect of saline ions.
The inhibition of total fresh and dry matter accumulation increased significantly ( Figure 3) as the saline concentrations increased, affectations of 41 and 43% respectively in a solution of 28 dS.m-1 were seen. Affectations of 43 and 48% during the accumulation of fresh and dry matters in WL – 711 have been found (15) in saline solution with a electric conductivity of 16 dS.m-1, measured 7 days after germination. Such authors have also pointed out that the adverse effect of the salinity in plants growth and biomass accumulation can be attenuated with the exogenous hormones application.
Figure 3. Inhibition of total fresh and dry matter accumulation under salt conditions
Starting from the linear regression analysis between the evaluated indicators and the levels of salinity studied (Table 1) the correlation coefficient in all cases was negative and highly significant what corroborates that as well as saline concentrations increase, plants growth and fresh and dry matter accumulation diminishes.
Table 1. Regression equation, correlation coefficient and levels of salinity that diminish plants growth in a 50%.
Indicators. | Regression equation | r | r2 | E. C(30%) dS.m-1 |
PH | Y=100.38- 0.991X | -0.990** | 98.01 | 31 |
R L | Y=103.08- 0.975X | -0.975** | 94.09 | 34 |
FM | Y=98.40 – 0.990X | -0.990** | 98.01 | 29 |
DM | Y=93.450- 0.932X | -0.932** | 86.49 | 30 |
HP: plants height RL: root length FM: Fresh matter DM: Dry matter.
** high significative differences.
Starting from the regression equations between the evaluated indicators and the levels of salinity (Table 2), the theoretical levels of electric conductivity that diminish the growth and biomass accumulation in 30% were determined being a bigger sensibility in dry and fresh biomass accumulation and plants height in relation to root length, agreeing with the results obtained by several authors (15, 17, 18) which have recommended such indicators for the efficient selection of tolerant wheat varieties to salinity.
By observing the Principal Component Analysis, in the two first components obtained a greater percentage of the total variability with 55.98% and that: absorbed water at 16 dS.m-1, plants height at 16 dS.m-1, root length at 25 dS.m-1 at the first component and dry matter accumulation at 16dS.m-1 at the second component resulted the variables of higher correlation with the principal axis (Table 2) showing the practicality of such indicators for an efficient selection of tolerant varieties to salinity at the early stages of growing in wheat.
Some authors have arrived to similar conclusions about the use of such indicators for discriminating tolerant genotypes to salt stress in several crops including wheat (8, 9, 10).
Table 2: Principal Compounds Variables.
Variables | Principal components (Axis) | |
1 | 2 | |
Water Absorption at 16 dS.m-1 | -0.90 | -0.19 |
plants height at 16 dS.m-1 | -0.85 | 0.41 |
root length 16dS.m-1 | -0.69 | 0.49 |
fresh matter 16 dS.m-1 | 0.11 | -0.25 |
dry matter 16 dS.m-1 | -0.52 | -0.73 |
Water Absorption at 25 dS.m-1 | 0.42 | 0.36 |
plants height at 25 dS.m-1 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
root length 25 dS.m-1 | -0.76 | 0.59 |
fresh matter 25 dS.m-1 | -0.63 | 0.49 |
dry matter 25 dS.m-1 | -0.42 | 0.68 |
Eigenvalues | 3.00 | 2.34 |
contribution Percentage | 34.63 | 21.35 |
total Contribution |
| 55.98 |
Starting from these variables of more correlation with principal axes, a cluster analysis, of Complete ligkange based on Euclidian distance matrix, was carried out, in order to group the varieties, what allowed to gather the genotypes in three groups, showing the existence of genetic variability for the response to salt stress (Figures 1). This is an important aspect since the tolerance to salinity is considered a finite magnitude character and its improvement presupposes the existence of usable levels in the germoplasm conserved in banks (8). Some differences in salt stress tolerance in wheat have been informed by several authors (9, 10). In this respect 1300 wheat varieties during the germination phenophase were evaluated and a high genetic diversity was found, what allowed to select varieties with high tolerance to salinity (9,10). These authors also pointed out that the hexaploid varieties (AABBDD) showed higher tolerance index than tetrapliod (AABB) and diploid (AA) varieties, concluding that the genetic factor that control salt stress tolerance should be localized at "DD genome"
Chart 4. Dendrogram obtained from the cluster analysis.
The group I formed by IRM-26 IRM-29 IRM-31, RM-36, IRM-37 Cuba-C-204 floury wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum) was the one of better response to salt stress, with the highest tolerance index (more than 80% in all cases) for the four variables that more contributed to the total variability, classifying as a tolerant (Chart III), however, the absorbed water index at 25 dS.m-1 was smaller than the remaining variables of this group, which will be studied based on advanced indicators like seeds water potential, better than quantity of absorbed water by the gravimeter method, due to the Importance of this process for correct germination. In such sense, it has been concluded that there is not a direct relationship among the response to salinity evaluated based on the water absorption of seeds and the plants growth (11) and since during the water absorption take place mostly physical phenomena (4) it is accepted that the evaluation of varietal response to salinity, according to the quantity of absorbed water by the seeds in saline solutions related to control, is not a highly precise indicator and it can only be used as a reference indicator, to simplify the work in the initial evaluation of big groups of varieties and/or lines to discriminate susceptible varieties.
Chart III: Means values of tolerance index based on water absorption and growing indicators.
Group | Varieties or lines
| Means values of tolerance index. | |||
AW 25dS.m-1 | PH 25 dS.m-1 | RL 28 dS.m-1 | DM 25 dS.m-1 | ||
I | IRM-26, IRM-29, IRM-31, RM-36, Cuba-C-204 | 81.02 | 86.56 | 88.98 | 89.23 |
II | Mexicana24, 10 TH29 IRM-30, IRM-37, IRM-32 Idyn18 | 87.31 | 71.49 | 79.08 | 25.82 |
III | Eduyt 16 | 67.85 | 45.78 | 71.34 | 88.55 |
AA. Absorbed water; HP. plants height; RL. root length. DM; dry matter accumulation.
The second group formed by Mexicana24, 10 TH29 IRM-30, IRM-37, IRM-32 Idyn18 floury wheat varieties (Triticum aestivum) and a hard wheat variety (Triticum durum) (Idyn18), was classified as moderately tolerant. This cluster of floury wheat varieties in first and second groups indicates the superiority of this species in the response to salt stress (10), aspect that is necessary to check based on biochemical and molecular indicators with the purpose of isolating tolerance genes that can be transferred to commercial varieties of high productivity (9).
The variety of hard wheat Eduyt 16 formed the third group classifying as susceptible, for that, in futures implementation programs in affected areas by salt stress or in genetics improvement programs for this character could be discriminated against.
In some experiments with T. Aestivum, T. Durum Desf, T. turanicum Jakubz and T. ispahanicum Heslot and the endemic T. dicoccoides Aarans, T. timofheevi Zhuk, T. spelta and T. turgidum L., there was a higher salt stress tolerance in T. aestivum and this behavior was attributed due to the great distribution all over the world and/ or to this specie is conformed by a great quantity of varieties of different ecologist-geographical origins affected by soil salinity (12).
The varieties with name (INIFAT) of the group I were obtained, in Cuba at the of fundamental Investigations of Tropical Agriculture Institute (INIFAT), by mutation induction, starting from the Cuban variety CubaC – 204 the one which, in previous experiences, showed a good response in high saline concentrations for evaluating seeds germination and plants growth (4). In this respect the possibility of generating heritable variation for the tolerance to salinity in wheat has been indicated (13, 18) which has an important practical significance, because the natural variability for this character it is considered low in the cultivated plants in general and in particular in wheat.
Something significant in all groups was that at 28 dS.m-1 the tolerance indexes for root length variable (RL) were high, agreeing with results obtained by several authors (17,15) recommending this variable as an efficient indicator for the selection of tolerant varieties to salinity. It has been concluded that the gramineous ones that, placed in high saline concentrations, and they reach a good root system development they have big possibilities to be tolerant to this kind of stress (15,16 ).
The evaluating methodology used in this experiment means to be simple and economic since it allows to discriminate, under laboratory conditions, the varieties with more susceptibility grade (17,18) and to incorporate to the field those that show a good behavior, which, constitutes its biggest utilitarian value in a first phase, to isolate the initial material with less perspectives inside a genetic improvement program for salinity tolerance.
REFERENCES
1. Royo. A y R. Aragues . Establecimiento de nuevos índices de tolerancia de los cultivos a la salinidad: la cebada como caso de estudio. Investigación Agraria. Producción y Producción Vegetal, 2002. 17 (3): 410- 421.
2. CUBA. MINAGRI. Informe anual sobre la Agricultura. Avances y pérdidas. P.P Granma, Jueves, 25 Diciembre.2003.
3. González, L.M y R. Ramírez. Los suelos salinos y su utilización en la producción agrícola. Alimentaria. 2002, Dic. 339: 103-107.
4. Mesa, D. Obtención de plantas resistentes a la salinidad para los suelos salinos cubanos. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola. 2003, 37 (3): 217-226.
5. FAO. Fooding distribution along the wold, 2003. Paper 23, Roma, 186 pp.
6. Isla y Royo. Tolerancia a la salinidad en la tribu triticeae. Investigación Agraria, Producción y Protección vegetal, 1997, 12 (1, 2 y 3): 133-145.
7. González, L. M. Reflexiones sobre los mecanismos generales de adaptación de las plantas a la salinidad y a otros tipos de estrés, Alimentaria, 2002. Dic. 339: 99-102..
8. Chávez, L; LM. González y R. Ramírez. Efecto de la salinidad sobre a absorción de agua por las semillas de Vigna unguiculata (L) y su relación con la tolerancia varietal. Alimentaria, 2002, 339: 99-102.
9. González, L.M y R. Ramírez. La absorción de agua por las semillas de arroz a altas concentraciones salinas, como posible indicador de la tolerancia varietal. Cultivos Tropicales, 1999, 20 (1): 31-34.
10. Prazak, R. Salt-tolerance of triticum monococum L. , Triticum dicocum (s chank) Schubl., Triticum durum Desf and Triticum eastivum L. Seedlgings. Journal of Aplied Genetic, 2000, vol. 42, no. 3 p. 289-292.
11. Maya, P; A. Monzón y M. Ponce. Datos sobre la germinación de especies endémicas Canarias. Bot. 1988, M, 16: 677-680.
12. Scott, S. J; Jones, R.A; Wiliams. Review of data analysis. Methods for seed germination. Crop Science. 1984, 24: 1192-1199.
13. Kumar, D y J.S.P. Yadav. Salt tolerance of mutants from wheat veriety HD 1553. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 1983,53 (12) 1009- 1015.
14. Singh, G; P. Kaur y R. Sharma. effect of CCC on seed germination and early seedling growth in wheat under saline conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. Plant Physiology, 1985, 28 (4): 310-317.
15. Royo, A. Y D Abió. Sal tolerance in durum wheat cultivars. Spanich Journal of Agricultural Research, 2003,1 (3): 27-35.
16. Argentel, L., L.M. González. Comportamiento de la tolerancia interespecífica a la salinidad en dos especies del género Triticum. Cultivos Tropicales, 2006, vol. 27 no. 2, p. 51-52
17. González, L.M, L. Argentel. Efecto de la sequía simulada con PEG-6000 sobre la germinación y el crecimiento de dos variedades de trigo. Cultivos Tropicales, 2005, vol. 26 no. 4, p. 49-54
18. Mano, Y & K Takeda. Genetic resourses of salt- tolerance at germination and the seedling stage in wheat. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 2001, vol. 70, no. 2, p. 215-220.
Autor:
M Sc. L. Argentel
leandris[arroba]udg.co.cu
Dr. C. L. M. Gonzalez
Ing. I. Fonseca
R. Samsom
Dr. C. R. Lopez
Lic. R.Girón
M Sc. L. Argentel, Ing. I. Fonseca . Dr. C. R. Lopez Asistant teachers of Granma University. Bayamo. Cuba. Dr. C. L. M. Gonzalez, Titular Researcher of ARI J. Dimitrov, Bayamo. Cuba. . R. Samsom .Lic. R.Girón
Página anterior | Volver al principio del trabajo | Página siguiente |